Ecosystem furnishings of biodiversity loss could rival impacts of climate change, pollution

ANN ARBOR—Loss of biodiversity appears to affect ecosystems equally much as climatic change, pollution and other major forms of environmental stress, according to a new written report from an international enquiry team.

The study is the offset comprehensive attempt to directly compare the impacts of biological diversity loss to the anticipated effects of a host of other human-acquired environmental changes.

The results highlight the need for stronger local, national and international efforts to protect biodiversity and the benefits it provides, co-ordinate to the researchers, who are based at ix institutions in the United States, Canada and Sweden.

"Loss of biological diversity due to species extinctions is going to have major impacts on our planet, and we better fix ourselves to deal with them," said University of Michigan ecologist Bradley Cardinale, one of the authors. The study is scheduled for online publication in the journal Nature on May ii.

"These extinctions may well rank every bit one of the acme five drivers of global change," said Cardinale, an assistant professor at the U-M School of Natural Resources and Surround and an assistant professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology.

Studies over the concluding two decades have demonstrated that more biologically diverse ecosystems are more productive. As a result, in that location has been growing concern that the very high rates of modern extinctions – due to habitat loss, overharvesting and other human-caused environmental changes – could reduce nature's power to provide goods and services like food, make clean water and a stable climate.

But until at present, it's been unclear how biodiversity losses stack upward against other human-caused environmental changes that touch on ecosystem health and productivity.

"Some people take causeless that biodiversity effects are relatively minor compared to other environmental stressors," said biologist David Hooper of Western Washington University, the atomic number 82 author of the Nature paper. "Our new results show that future loss of species has the potential to reduce institute product but equally much equally global warming and pollution."

In their report, Hooper and his colleagues used combined data from a large number of published studies to compare how diverse global environmental stressors affect 2 processes of import in all ecosystems: found growth and the decomposition of dead plants by bacteria and fungi. The new study involved the construction of a data base drawn from 192 peer-reviewed publications about experiments that manipulated species richness and examined the affect on ecosystem processes.

The global synthesis past Hooper and his colleagues found that in areas where local species loss this century falls within the lower range of projections (loss of i to 20 pct of establish species), negligible impacts on ecosystem found growth will result, and changes in species richness will rank low relative to the impacts projected for other environmental changes.

In ecosystems where species losses fall inside intermediate projections (21 to 40 percent of species), however, species loss is expected to reduce plant growth past 5 to 10 pct, an effect that is comparable in magnitude to the expected impacts of climate warming and increased ultraviolet radiation due to stratospheric ozone loss.

At higher levels of extinction (41 to 60 percent of species), the impacts of species loss ranked with those of many other major drivers of environmental change, such as ozone pollution, acid degradation on forests, and nutrient pollution.

"Within the range of expected species losses, we saw average declines in institute growth that were as large as changes seen in experiments simulating several other major environmental changes caused past humans," Hooper said. "I call up several of us working on this study were surprised by the comparative strength of those furnishings."

The strength of the observed biodiversity effects suggests that policymakers searching for solutions to other pressing environmental problems should be enlightened of potential agin furnishings on biodiversity, every bit well, the researchers said.

Still to be adamant is how diversity loss and other large-scale ecology changes will collaborate to alter ecosystems. "The biggest challenge looking forward is to predict the combined impacts of these environmental challenges to natural ecosystems and to society," said J. Emmett Duffy of the Virginia Found of Marine Scientific discipline, a co-author of the paper.

Authors of the Nature paper, in addition to Hooper, Cardinale and Duffy, are: East. Carol Adair of the University of Vermont and the National Middle for Ecological Assay and Synthesis; Jarrett E.Yard. Byrnes of the National Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis; Bruce Hungate of Northern Arizona University; Kristen Matulich of University of California Irvine; Andrew Gonzalez of McGill University; Lars Gamfeldt of the University of Gothenburg; and Mary O'Connor of the University of British Columbia and the National Center for Ecological Assay and Synthesis.

Funding for the study included grants from the National Scientific discipline Foundation and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis.

"This analysis establishes that reduced biodiversity affects ecosystems at levels comparable to those of global warming or air pollution," said Henry Gholz, program director in the National Science Foundation'due south Division of Environmental Biology, which funded the research.

Related Links:

  • Images are available at http://news.wwu.edu/go/doctype/1538/21453/

M planet blue: the sustainable difference U-Thou Sustainability fosters a more sustainable world through collaborations beyond campus and beyond aimed at educating students, generating new knowledge, and minimizing our environmental footprint. Learn more than at sustainability.umich.edu.